Independent archive. This site is not operated by or affiliated with the original TurboPepe team. It documents a token that is no longer actively developed.

TurboPepe ($VROOM)

An Ethereum memecoin launched on 13 May 2023 that peaked within hours of launch at a fully diluted value near $794,302 and has been inactive since. This page documents what the project was, what the token is worth now, and what can still be done with it — using the pool's own on-chain record rather than price trackers.

Current state

Price
$0.00000007099
2026-10-06
Down from ATH
−96.25%
ATH $0.000002 on 2023-05-13
Fully diluted value
$29,814
peak $794,302
24h volume
$3.96
1 buy · 0 sell
Pool liquidity
$42,740
Uniswap V2, not withdrawn
Holders
1,864
still holding the token

Read the volume alongside the price. Price trackers show a number for VROOM, but with $3.96 of volume in 24 hours that number comes from almost no trading. A price without liquidity behind it is not a price you can realise.

What it was

TurboPepe launched on 2023-05-13 at 20:06 UTC through a Pinksale fairlaunch as an ERC-20 token on Ethereum with a total supply of 420,000,069,000 VROOM, zero buy and sell tax, and liquidity locked for a nominal 42,069 days. It was one of hundreds of Pepe-derivative memecoins launched in the weeks after PEPE itself.

The project later added two things beyond the token: TPAIC (Turbo Pepe AI Club), a 420-piece NFT collection, and VROOM RACING, an NFT racing game on Ethereum exclusive to TPAIC holders. Both are covered onthe NFT page.

Where to go next

Questions

Is TurboPepe still active?

No. The token contract still exists and the Uniswap pool still holds liquidity, but there has been no development activity, and 24-hour trading volume is a few dollars. The project is inactive.

Is VROOM worth anything?

At the last snapshot one VROOM traded at $0.00000007099, putting the fully diluted value near $29,814. With roughly $42,740 of pool liquidity, only small amounts can be sold without moving the price heavily.

Was TurboPepe a rug pull?

The on-chain evidence does not support that. Liquidity was never withdrawn from the Uniswap pool and is still there. What happened looks like abandonment, not an exit scam.

Which contract address is the real one?

0x73D3A884322AF11C6a5e35118c8296CBdAd68cAF. A second address appears on the pre-launch version of the site, but it has never recorded a single token transfer — it was a placeholder, not an earlier version of the token.

Why does this site show a different all-time high than price trackers?

Because it is reconstructed from the Uniswap pool's own event log. Every trade in a Uniswap V2 pool updates the reserves, and the price is the ratio between them. VROOM only ever had one pool, so that record is complete. The figure published by trackers is far above anything the pool ever recorded.

Sources

On-chain figures come from the GeckoTerminal pool pageand Etherscan, taken 2026-10-06. The all-time high and the full price history are reconstructed from 3,611 on-chain pool events — see how and why that differs from the trackers. Historical site content is from the Wayback Machine.